Introduction
Philosophical systems, resting upon the formal, metaphysical logic, are already
incapable to reduce the accumulated knowledge to a definite system and to
comprehend accumulated errors in a system of physical and mathematical theories.
Therefore, in the third millennium, such philosophical systems must become
outdated as, in a considerable degree, onesided, i.e., only partially right
and, hence, as ineffective ones.
Dialectics represents a synthesis of the best achievements of both materialism
and idealism, and it is the ground for understanding of the materialideal
essence of the World. The main postulates of the dialectical philosophy and the
advantage of the dialectical logic over the metaphysical logic are briefly
presented in the authors' (L. Kreidik and G. Shpenkov) books.
Physics that we develop is called dialectical because it rests upon dialectics 
dialectical philosophy, dialectical logic, and algebra of dialectical judgments.
Dialectics indicates the correct directions of theoretical thought and, thus,
excludes an appearance of unfounded (fictitious) ideas and absurd
contradictions. Dialectical physics develops a general theory of
matterspacetime and of the wave fields of exchange (interaction) of
matterspace and restmotion. In dialectical models of nature, the logical triad
of matterspacetime expresses an indissoluble bond of matter, space, and time.
The logical pair of motionrest presents an indissoluble bond of motion and
rest, etc.
The primordial principal point of natural science always is the structure of
matter and its "elementary" bricks, atoms. The lasts belong to one of the levels
of the manylevel Universe where the perfect harmony between micro, macro, and
megalevels (e.g., subatomic, atomic, molecular, etc.) takes place. The internal
structure of atoms is inseparable from the structure of the Universe on the
whole. Accordingly, atoms cannot be considered separately from the general
structure of the Universe that is the principal feature of dialectical approach.
In dialectics, the atomic world is considered in the indissoluble relation with
the stellar world, since both worlds mutually define each other.
We live in the multidimensional physical space of the Universe. Atomic theory
of matterspacetime, developing in the framework of dialectics, rests upon the
physical infinitedimensionality of the real field of matterspacetime. The
real physical manydimensional space and the space of matter are considered in
the indissoluble relation with the fieldspace of physical time. All three
spacesfields do not exist separately; therefore, we regard physical processes
and objects of nature as elements of this triad of matterspacetime.
Along with the laws of physical fields of matterspacetime, which we call the
first kind laws, dialectical physics accepts the laws of ideal fieldspaces of
the Universe called the second kind laws. The universal law of exchange of
matterspace and motionrest lies in the basis of all first kind laws. All
particular first kind laws originate from this universal law.
One of the second kind laws  the Law of Decimal Base of the Universe with the
fundamental period equal to units  exhibits itself in the Earth's nations'
metrology, in the quantitative spectrum of arbitrary measures and characteristic
parameters of different objects and processes in nature. There are many reasons
to regard this law as the Decimal Code of the Universe. We assume that it
connects the Past and the Future in a single process of Eternity. Many
characteristic parameters of the microworld are on the lines of this discrete
spectrum.
In contrast to the fully developed tradition, based on the description of nature
with use of the notion of probability of games of chance, dialectics proposes a
theory of the physical probability. The physical probability is represented by
waves of probability. These waves represent a theoretical prognosis of physical
waves of matterspacetime; therefore, the waves of probability are defined by
the same measures as the physical waves. In form, the waves of probability
coincide with the physical waves of matterspacetime. By virtue of this, there
are no problems with the interpretation of waves of probability, because they
represent a mathematical copy of realized waves of the most probable exchange of
matterspacetime.
Such a general picture of the waves of probability allows the writing of wave
equations and the obtaining on their basis the wave prognosispicture of real
processes and states of nature (including those that concern atoms of
matterspacetime). With such a generalized approach, there is no necessity (as
it takes place, e.g., in quantum mechanics) to introduce quantum numbers and
parameters that are absent in the wave equations themselves. The new approach
leads to the periodic law of elementary structural units of matterspacetime,
revealing the nature of Mendeleyev's Periodic Table from the new point of view.
In the same way that symmetry and asymmetry, rest and motion, left and right are
inseparable from one another, the world of the infinitesimal (microworld) and
the world of infinitely the great (megaworld) go alongside each other in the
physical infinitedimensional spaces of the Universe. Micro and megaparameters
of an atom and its components define this mutual conjugation. But modern physics
does not characterize atoms by megaparameters, because it does not know such
features of individual atoms. Therefore, modern physics is bound to attach
together different levels of an infinite series of fields of matterspacetime.
Accordingly, unification of electromagnetic and gravitational interactions is
the greatest unsolved problem of physics. Dialectical physics proposes
convincing logically noncontradictory solutions to this subject as well.
On the basis of the universal law of exchange, the real sense of the notion mass
is revealed. As it turns out, a mass has the associated feature and is the
measure of exchange of any object in the Universe of matterspace and
restmotion (matterspacetime briefly) with the surrounding fieldspace.
Through this, the nature of charges, "electric" and "magnetic", is revealed.
Dialectical physics shows the imperfections and errors of commonly used theories
of measures. Measures of dialectical physics do not contain units with
halfinteger powers of the gram and the centimeter, both explicitly and
implicitly. It gives the possibility (when we know the dimensionality of a
physical quantity) to draw responsible scientific conclusions about the
structure of objects or phenomena of nature, which are described by this
dimensionality. In particular, it concerns the nature of charges.
The system of measures of dialectical physics has only three qualitative
reference units: the gram, the centimeter, and the second related to a triad of
matterspacetime. All remaining qualitative units are referred to the category
of derivative units. Qualitative units represent the first kind laws. The
fundamental quantitative units originate from the Law of the Decimal Code of the
Universe and represent the second kind laws. Both basic systems of units,
quantitative and qualitative, form together a quantitativequalitative frame of
the system used in dialectical physics.
Theoretical analysis of completed calculations shows that the electrostatic
field does not exist in nature. Actually it is an exafrequency wave field. Its
fundamental frequency defines many structures of matterspacetime at the
subatomic and atomic levels. The exafrequency field of exchange of subatomic
levels of matterspacetime is hidden under the term of the electrostatic field.
Quantum mechanics accidentally touches upon this field because it deals with the
socalled wave function, not understanding however the wave sense of the
function and its complex structure. Therefore, it operates with the modulus
squared of the wave function.
In view of the omnipresent character of quantum mechanics, at the present stage
of development of science, in particular of atomic physics and atomic
technologies, it increases the definite danger of the further existence of
quantum mechanics in science, as the theory in the highest degree distortedly
describes the World. This is most important, as in the course of many decades,
the opinion, in which quantum mechanics perfectly describes the microworld, has
been propagated and strengthened in the consciousness of many people. With this,
ideologists of these views have ignored the fact that the correspondence of any
theory with the experiment does not quite mean that the given theory is true and
uniquely possible (it concerns quantum electrodynamics as well). And what is
more, the possibilities of modern mathematics are so impressive that it can
represent any abstract absurdity as a profound theory (or its development) and
fit it to the experiment.
Our knowledge about nature must be concrete as far as possible. It concerns, in
particular, the spatial structure of atoms. Nanotechnology, where dimensions of
devices tend towards magnitudes comparable with parameters of crystal lattices
and less, i.e., to atomic sizes, requires it. Unfortunately, it is not an
objective of modern physics because of the domination of quantum mechanics with
its postulate of the impossibility to imagine a clear spatial structure of
microobjects of the atomic and subatomic levels.
A part of the aforementioned problems, considered in the framework of the
dialectical approach, are concisely presented here in the posted papers. Their
list will be gradually supplemented.




Summary 


Related Links 


Miscellaneous 


Videos 


Lectures on Dialectical Physics 

